Truth about carbon dating
Other critics, perhaps more familiar with the data, question certain aspects of the quality of the fossil record and of its dating.These skeptics do not provide scientific evidence for their views.
In the past 150 years they have not found any fossils that Darwin would not have expected.New discoveries have filled in the gaps, and shown us in unimaginable detail the shape of the great ‘tree of life’.Darwin and his contemporaries could never have imagined the improvements in resolution of stratigraphy that have come since 1859, nor guessed what fossils were to be found in the southern continents, nor predicted the huge increase in the number of amateur and professional paleontologists worldwide.Anything that was never alive cannot be dated using carbon dating methods.References to carbon dating of rocks, for example, are inaccurate since rocks were never alive.Notice that something must have been alive to absorb C-12 and C-14.
Therefore it is not possible to date inorganic material.
ost people think carbon dating can be used to establish the age of anything old.
They believe every artifact dug up or discovered by archeologists, anthropologists, geologists, or other scientists can have its age accurately determined, within a narrow range, by carbon dating. Let’s look at carbon-14 dating to discover just how accurate and reliable it really is. First, it is based on the ratio of two elements—carbon 12 (C-12) to carbon 14 (C-14)—found in a sample of the object being dated.
Carbon-14 cannot be used to date biological artifacts of organisms that did not get their carbon dioxide from the air.
This rules out carbon dating for most aquatic organisms, because they often obtain at least some of their carbon from dissolved carbonate rock.
The carbon absorbed is both C-12 and C-14 and it is absorbed at the same ratio as it exists in the atmosphere.